Where I-O psychology should really (re)start its investigation of intelligence constructs and their measurement
We believe that Scherbaum, Goldstein, Yusko, Ryan, and Hanges (2012) come up short in (a) their portrayal of the current understanding of the nature of intelligence as it exists in the science of mental abilities and (b) their treatment of the measurement of intelligence constructs. We argue that th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | LIEVENS, Filip, REEVE, Charlie L. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5615 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6614/viewcontent/IOP.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Understanding the assessment center process: Where are we now?
by: LIEVENS, Filip, et al.
Published: (2001) -
Selecting employees for global assignments: Can assessment centers measure cultural intelligence?
by: HARRIS, Michael M., et al.
Published: (2005) -
What does exercise-based assessment really mean?
by: LIEVENS, Filip
Published: (2008) -
What Do Self and Peer Ratings Really Measure?
by: GREGURAS, Gary J., et al.
Published: (2004) -
A critical review of research and publication trends in the field of industrial and organizational psychology
by: LIEVENS, Filip, et al.
Published: (2012)