Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments

As consumers become increasingly reliant on online reviews to make purchase decisions, the sales of the product becomes dependent on the word of mouth (WOM) that it generates. As a result, there can be attempts by firms to manipulate online reviews of products to increase their sales. Despite the su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HU, Nan, BOSE, Indranil, KOH, Noi Sian, LIU, Ling
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/644
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1643/viewcontent/Manipulation_Online_Reviews_2012_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-1643
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-16432019-11-26T03:49:44Z Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments HU, Nan BOSE, Indranil KOH, Noi Sian LIU, Ling As consumers become increasingly reliant on online reviews to make purchase decisions, the sales of the product becomes dependent on the word of mouth (WOM) that it generates. As a result, there can be attempts by firms to manipulate online reviews of products to increase their sales. Despite the suspicion on the existence of such manipulation, the amount of such manipulation is unknown, and deciding which reviews to believe in is largely based on the reader's discretion and intuition. Therefore, the success of the manipulation of reviews by firms in generating sales of products is unknown. In this paper, we propose a simple statistical method to detect online reviews manipulation, and assess how consumers respond to products with manipulated reviews. In particular, the writing style of reviewers is examined, and the effectiveness of manipulation through ratings, sentiments, and readability is investigated. Our analysis examines textual information available in online reviews by combining sentiment mining techniques with readability assessments. We discover that around 10.3% of the products are subject to online reviews manipulation. In spite of the deliberate use of sentiments and ratings in manipulated products, consumers are only able to detect manipulation taking place through ratings, but not through sentiments. The findings from this research ensue a note of caution for all consumers that rely on online reviews of books for making purchases, and encourage them to delve deep into the book reviews without being deceived by fraudulent manipulation. 2012-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/644 info:doi/10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.002 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1643/viewcontent/Manipulation_Online_Reviews_2012_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Manipulation Online reviews Ratings Readability Runs test Sentiments Text mining Computer Sciences E-Commerce Social Media
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Manipulation
Online reviews
Ratings
Readability
Runs test
Sentiments
Text mining
Computer Sciences
E-Commerce
Social Media
spellingShingle Manipulation
Online reviews
Ratings
Readability
Runs test
Sentiments
Text mining
Computer Sciences
E-Commerce
Social Media
HU, Nan
BOSE, Indranil
KOH, Noi Sian
LIU, Ling
Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments
description As consumers become increasingly reliant on online reviews to make purchase decisions, the sales of the product becomes dependent on the word of mouth (WOM) that it generates. As a result, there can be attempts by firms to manipulate online reviews of products to increase their sales. Despite the suspicion on the existence of such manipulation, the amount of such manipulation is unknown, and deciding which reviews to believe in is largely based on the reader's discretion and intuition. Therefore, the success of the manipulation of reviews by firms in generating sales of products is unknown. In this paper, we propose a simple statistical method to detect online reviews manipulation, and assess how consumers respond to products with manipulated reviews. In particular, the writing style of reviewers is examined, and the effectiveness of manipulation through ratings, sentiments, and readability is investigated. Our analysis examines textual information available in online reviews by combining sentiment mining techniques with readability assessments. We discover that around 10.3% of the products are subject to online reviews manipulation. In spite of the deliberate use of sentiments and ratings in manipulated products, consumers are only able to detect manipulation taking place through ratings, but not through sentiments. The findings from this research ensue a note of caution for all consumers that rely on online reviews of books for making purchases, and encourage them to delve deep into the book reviews without being deceived by fraudulent manipulation.
format text
author HU, Nan
BOSE, Indranil
KOH, Noi Sian
LIU, Ling
author_facet HU, Nan
BOSE, Indranil
KOH, Noi Sian
LIU, Ling
author_sort HU, Nan
title Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments
title_short Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments
title_full Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments
title_fullStr Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments
title_full_unstemmed Manipulation of Online Reviews: An Analysis of Ratings, Readability, and Sentiments
title_sort manipulation of online reviews: an analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2012
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/644
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1643/viewcontent/Manipulation_Online_Reviews_2012_av.pdf
_version_ 1770570632609660928