A comprehensive examination of the cross-validity of Pareto-Optimal versus fixed-weight selection systems in the biobjective selection context.
The article presents evidence for the cross-validity potential of fixed-weight (FW) versus Pareto-Optimal (PO) selection systems in biobjective selection situations where both the goals of diversity and quality are valued and the importance of the goals is undecided a priori. The article extends pre...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | DE CORTE, Wilfried, LIEVENS, Filip, SACKETT, Paul R. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6862 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7861/viewcontent/BiobjectiveSelection_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Designing Pareto-optimal selection systems: Formalizing the decisions required for selection system development
by: DE CORTE, Wilfried, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Designing Pareto-Optimal Selection Systems for Multiple Minority Subgroups and Multiple Criteria
by: DE CORTE, Wilfried, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Robustness, sensitivity and sampling variability of Pareto-optimal selection system solutions to address the quality-diversity trade-off
by: DE CORTE, Wilfried, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact
by: DE CORTE, Wilfried, et al.
Published: (2007) -
The risk of adverse impact in selections based on a test with known effect size
by: DE CORTE, Wilfried, et al.
Published: (2005)