Insights from an updated personnel selection meta-analytic matrix: Revisiting general mental ability tests’ role in the validity-diversity trade-Off
General mental ability (GMA) tests have long been at the heart of the validity–diversity trade-off, with conventional wisdom being that reducing their weight in personnel selection can improve adverse impact, but that this results in steep costs to criterion-related validity. However, Sackett et al....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | BERRY, Christopher M., LIEVENS, Filip, ZHANG, Charlene, SACKETT, Paul R. |
---|---|
格式: | text |
語言: | English |
出版: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7568 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8567/viewcontent/UpdatedGMA_av.pdf |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
相似書籍
-
Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors
由: SACKETT, Paul R., et al.
出版: (2023) -
Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range
由: SACKETT, Paul R., et al.
出版: (2022) -
Personnel selection
由: SACKETT, Paul R., et al.
出版: (2008) -
Alternative predictors for dealing with the diversity-validity dilemma in personnel selection: The constructed response multimedia test
由: DE SOETE, Britt, et al.
出版: (2013) -
Correcting for range restriction in meta-analysis: A reply to Oh et al. (2023)
由: SACKETT, Paul R., et al.
出版: (2023)