Insights from an updated personnel selection meta-analytic matrix: Revisiting general mental ability tests’ role in the validity-diversity trade-Off
General mental ability (GMA) tests have long been at the heart of the validity–diversity trade-off, with conventional wisdom being that reducing their weight in personnel selection can improve adverse impact, but that this results in steep costs to criterion-related validity. However, Sackett et al....
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | BERRY, Christopher M., LIEVENS, Filip, ZHANG, Charlene, SACKETT, Paul R. |
---|---|
التنسيق: | text |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7568 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8567/viewcontent/UpdatedGMA_av.pdf |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
المؤسسة: | Singapore Management University |
اللغة: | English |
مواد مشابهة
-
Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors
بواسطة: SACKETT, Paul R., وآخرون
منشور في: (2023) -
Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range
بواسطة: SACKETT, Paul R., وآخرون
منشور في: (2022) -
Personnel selection
بواسطة: SACKETT, Paul R., وآخرون
منشور في: (2008) -
Alternative predictors for dealing with the diversity-validity dilemma in personnel selection: The constructed response multimedia test
بواسطة: DE SOETE, Britt, وآخرون
منشور في: (2013) -
Correcting for range restriction in meta-analysis: A reply to Oh et al. (2023)
بواسطة: SACKETT, Paul R., وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)